Bitcoin Lawyer

Citizenship / Source of funds

The balance is the starting point. The history is the work.

A block explorer can show that Bitcoin moved. It cannot, on its own, show why it became yours or whether the money used to acquire it was lawful. A useful source-of-funds file joins financial records and transaction history into a narrative another person can verify.

Published by Bitcoin Lawyer

Answer two different questions.

The distinction matters for a long-term holder. An early purchase followed by appreciation may explain a large present value without a large recent salary. But the file still needs evidence of that purchase, the original funding and the path to the proposed payment. A truthful narrative should explain appreciation rather than inventing a new income event.

A wealth statement is broader than the contribution wallet. A funding schedule is narrower than your entire financial life. Agree the scope, time period and evidence required for the route so that the reviewer gets a coherent file without collecting irrelevant personal data.

Scroll to compare all columns

Answer two different questions.
QuestionScopeUseful evidence
Source of wealthHow did you build the overall assets you now hold?Employment and business records, asset sales, inheritance records and an acquisition chronology.
Source of fundsWhich specific assets will fund this application, and how did they reach their current location?Purchase records, withdrawals, wallet transfers, current control evidence and proposed payment details.

Match the evidence to the way you acquired it.

Exchange purchases

Preserve account ownership records, trade exports, deposit and withdrawal history, and bank records that explain the original money. Match dates, amounts and withdrawal identifiers. An exported balance without transactions rarely explains the whole acquisition.

Mining

Connect equipment ownership or hosting agreements, operating costs, pool accounts, payout records and receiving addresses. Distinguish gross mining receipts from expenses and later purchases. If a pool or operator no longer exists, record the missing source and the alternative contemporaneous evidence.

Business or employment income

Keep contracts, invoices, payroll or business accounts and the transaction records showing payment. Explain the actual service or activity and the person or business receiving the income. Corporate funds and personal funds should not be treated as interchangeable.

Inheritance, gifts or asset sales

Retain the documents that establish the transfer and the underlying asset or relationship. A transfer from a relative is not self-explanatory provenance. The relevant scope may include the transferor’s lawful source and evidence of the transaction.

Build the file in a reproducible order.

  1. Write the chronology

    Describe the major earning, purchase, custody and transfer events in date order. Separate facts supported by records from recollection and unresolved gaps.

  2. Inventory the sources

    List accounts, wallets and available records relevant to the proposed funds. Keep original exports intact and work from copies. Record the source and retrieval date of each file.

  3. Connect the events

    Reconcile bank payments to purchases, purchases to withdrawals, and withdrawals to subsequent movements. Distinguish internal transfers from receipts from someone else. Explain fees and splits where they affect reconciliation.

  4. Identify gaps

    Give each missing link an owner and next action: request an archive, locate an old statement, obtain a supporting contract or seek specialist review. Do not fill gaps with invented precision.

  5. Prepare the reviewer’s version

    Provide an indexed narrative, supporting documents and a clear schedule of the proposed funds. Retain the underlying originals so a reviewer can follow a claim back to its evidence.

A small file that shows what is still missing.

Fictional evidence specimen. These invented references illustrate a working chronology, not a client file, forensic conclusion or accepted application. No real addresses, transactions or identity documents are shown.

Scroll to compare all columns

A small file that shows what is still missing.
Event and recordWhat it supportsGap and next action
2016 earnings · PAY-01Employer statement records income paid to the applicant.Original bank statement is missing. Applicant requests the archive to connect the income with the later exchange funding.
2016 purchase · EX-01Exchange export records a Bitcoin purchase in an identified account.The export does not establish the original money’s source. Reviewer matches account ownership, deposits and PAY-01 when the archive arrives.
2016 withdrawal · WD-01Withdrawal record can be matched to an observed transfer out of the exchange.Applicant supplies the agreed evidence connecting the receiving wallet to them. An on-chain address alone is not a named owner.
2022 wallet move · TX-02Transaction record shows movement to another wallet. The applicant says both were theirs.Record the statement separately from proof. Reconcile the transfer and fees; do not label an internal move as new earnings.
Proposed payment · PLAN-01A draft schedule identifies which assets the applicant proposes to use. No payment has been made.Resolve earlier gaps, confirm the receiving instructions and obtain any required professional review before proceeding. Acceptance remains the recipient’s decision.

The record can support a narrower conclusion than the story suggests. Keep originals, label recollection, and leave unresolved links visible. Never provide private keys or seed phrases to complete an evidence file.

Prove what is needed without surrendering control.

A request to show control of an address is not a request for spending authority. Agree the purpose and method before signing anything. A signed message must be readable and appropriate to that purpose; do not approve an unexplained transaction or blind signature as an identity exercise.

Never disclose private keys, seed phrases or wallet backups. Extended public keys and complete transaction histories can also expose significant financial information. Share only what the agreed review needs through an appropriate channel, with access and retention understood. A general website enquiry is not that channel.

A new transfer does not repair an old gap.

Third-party receipts, missing exchange records, privacy-related transactions, sanctions exposure and unexplained large inflows need accurate disclosure and a route-specific assessment. They do not all have the same consequence, and no generic checklist can decide the outcome of enhanced review.

Do not cycle funds through a new wallet, exchange or intermediary to make their history appear simpler. That adds transactions without changing origin. Where the evidence is incomplete, the useful result may be a reconstruction plan, additional specialist advice, a different funding source with a genuine documented history, or a decision not to proceed.

Before you decide

Common questions.

Are screenshots enough?

They may support a file, but a screenshot often omits ownership, transaction detail and context. Preserve original statements or exports where available and explain how each item connects to the acquisition and proposed funds.

Do old coins automatically pass because they were held for years?

No. Holding duration and appreciation can explain the economic history, but neither replaces evidence of lawful acquisition. The assessment considers the full record and the receiving authority’s requirements.

Will the strategy session complete a forensic review?

No. The session can identify the evidence work and likely gaps. A detailed reconstruction, specialist analysis or application support must be included in a separately agreed scope and professional fee quote.

Your next step

Turn the guide into a working list.

Start by listing the records you hold, the decision you need to make, and the questions this guide leaves open. A free 15-minute screening call helps to establish eligibility.

Bitcoin source of funds: build the evidence trail · Bitcoin Lawyer